It is the duty and obligation of every Resident Welfare Association (RWA) or Municipal Corporation to ensure that stray dogs in every area have access to food and water in the absence of caregivers or community dog feeders, the Delhi High Court ruled (Dr. Maya D Chablani v. Radha Mittal).

A Single Judge Bench of Justice JR Midha also ruled that community dogs (stray dogs) have the right to food and citizens have the right to feed community dogs.

Hence, no person can restrict anybody from feeding dogs, until and unless it is causing harm or harassment to that other person.

“Community dogs (stray/street dogs) have the right to food and citizens have the right to feed community dogs….Any person having compassion for stray dogs can feed the dogs at their private entrance/porch/driveway of their house or any other place not shared with other residents. No person can restrict the other from feeding of dogs, until and unless it is causing harm or harassment to that other person,” the Court ruled.

No person can restrict the other from feeding of dogs, until and unless it is causing harm or harassment to that other person.

Delhi High Court

In exercising the right to feed dogs, care and caution should be taken to ensure that it does not impinge upon the rights of others or cause any harm, hindrance, harassment and nuisance to other individuals or members of the society, the Court said.

The Court also issued a slew of directions for the welfare of stray dogs.

The ruling came in a suit filed to restrain certain individuals from feeding stray dogs. The dispute was resolved amicably, but the Court was asked to lay down the guidelines with respect to feeding of stray dogs.

Community dogs (stray/street dogs) have the right to food and citizens have the right to feed community dogs.

Delhi High Court

The Court, therefore, heard the matter at length before issuing the following guidelines, among others.

– Community dogs (stray/street dogs) have the right to food and citizens have the right to feed community dogs but in exercising this right, care and caution should be taken to ensure that it does not impinge upon the rights of others or cause any harm, hinderance, harassment and nuisance to other individuals or members of the society.

– Feeding of the community dogs have to be done at areas designated by the Animal Welfare Board of India (AWBI) in consultation with Resident Welfare Associations or Municipal Corporation (in case RWA is not available).

– While determining the ‘designated area’, the AWBI and RWA/Municipal Corporations has to be conscious of the fact that every community dog is a territorial being and therefore, community dogs must be fed and tended to at places within their territory.

– It is the duty of the AWBI and the RWAs to ensure and keep in mind the fact that community dogs live in “packs” and care should be taken by the AWBI and RWAs to see that each “pack‟ ideally has different designated areas for feeding even if that means designating multiple areas in a locality.

– All law enforcement authorities shall ensure that no harassment or hindrance is caused to the person feeding street dogs at the designated feeding spot and to properly implement the AWBI Revised Guidelines on Pet dogs and street dogs dated 26th February, 2015.

– It shall be the duty and obligation of every Resident Welfare Associations or Municipal Corporation (in case RWA is not available) to ensure that every community dog in every area has access to food and water in the absence of caregivers or community dog feeders in the said area.

– Every dog is a territorial being, and therefore, the street dogs have to be fed and tended to at places within their territory which are not frequented, or less frequented, and sparingly used by the general public and residents.

– Any person having compassion for stray dogs can feed the dogs at their private entrance/porch/driveway of their house or any other place not shared with other residents.

– No person can restrict the other from feeding of dogs, until and unless it is causing harm or harassment to that other person.

– The residents and the members of the RWA as well as the dog feeders have to act in harmony with each other and not in a manner which shall lead to unpleasant circumstances in the colony.

– AWBI shall ensure that every Resident Welfare Association or Municipal Corporation (in case RWA is not available), shall have an Animal Welfare Committee, which shall be responsible for ensuring compliance of the provisions of the PCA Act and ensure harmony and ease of communication between caregivers, feeders or animal lovers and other residents.

– Municipal Corporations at the request of the RWA and / or local authority or persons volunteering to take such responsibility shall be responsible for having the stray dogs registered / vaccinated / sterilised.

– The dogs have to be sterilized and vaccinated and returned to the same area. Vaccinated and sterilized dogs cannot be removed by the Municipality.

– No hindrance, whatsoever, shall be caused to the persons in carrying out any activities in respect of the street dogs at the said spot. Also, it shall be the duty of the SHO concerned to ensure peace and harmony is maintained amongst the residents of the area.

– If any of the street / community dogs is injured or unwell, it shall be the duty of the RWA to secure treatment for such dog by the vets made available by the Municipal Corporation and / or privately from the funds of the RWA.

– Every RWA should form Guard and Dog partnerships and in consultation with the Delhi Police Dog Squad, the dogs can be trained to make them effective as guard dogs and yet friendly to those who live in the colony.

– If any of the street / community dog is injured or unwell, it shall be the duty of the RWA to secure treatment for such dog by the vets made available by the Municipal Corporation and / or privately from the funds of the RWA.

– In order to check the overpopulation of street dogs in the community, it is also the responsibility of community to get their street dog population sterilized through an NGO engaged in Dog sterilization programme.

The plaintiffs in the present case were represented by advocates Abhishek Gusain and Sam C Mathew.

Meanwhile the defendants were represented by advocates DK Pandey, Deepak Kumar, Pragyan Sharma with Amicus Curiae Nandita Rao. Also, advocates Manisha Karia, Sukhdha Kalra appeared for the defendants along with Adarsh Kumar and Nidhi Nagpal for Animal Welfare Board of India.

[Read Judgment]

Original Article From www.barandbench.com